What Is Net Neutrality in Simple Terms?

The principle of net neutrality dictates that no ISP can throttle, block access to or otherwise discriminate against certain types of internet traffic. This means that an ISP can’t charge you more for streaming, charge fees for “premium traffic” or block legal websites and other content. It also prevents ISPs from slowing down your internet while streaming or torrenting.

Why Are People Against Net Neutrality?

People who are against net neutrality are usually those who can benefit from its repeal, such as wealthy ISP owners, or those who prefer the neoliberal approach of deregulating all aspects of the free market.

Does the U.S. Have Net Neutrality?

Yes, as of December 2023, net neutrality is back on the menu in the U.S. following a five-year break.

What Is the Downside of Net Neutrality?

Net neutrality has no downsides for users in a practical sense. All arguments against net neutrality revolve around ISPs making less money by not being able to charge users more for high-demand traffic like streaming. According to opponents, this could lead to stagnation in innovation, though history has proven otherwise.

What Is Net Neutrality? Definition, Pros & Cons and Examples in Simple Terms in 2025

The topic of net neutrality has been in the limelight for the past two decades, but very few people know what net neutrality is or how it impacts them. Read on as we answer the question "what is net neutrality?"

Written by Aleksandar Kochovski (Writer)

Reviewed by Aleksander Hougen (Co-Chief Editor)

Facts checked by Goran Nikolić (Fact-checking editor)

Last Updated: 04 Jul'24

All our content is written fully by humans; we do not publish AI writing. Learn more here.

Key Takeaways: Net Neutrality in Simple Terms

Net neutrality is based on the principle that ISPs should treat internet traffic impartially, regardless of the source, destination or content.
Though it was repealed in the U.S. in 2017, net neutrality made a comeback near the end of 2023.
Around the world, the European Union and India have some of the strictest net neutrality regulations, while Russia and China have a poor net neutrality record.

Facts & Expert Analysis: Net Neutrality & Its Impact

The FCC and net neutrality: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) initially issued orders in favor of net neutrality,¹ classifying all broadband providers as telecoms, which placed them under the FCC’s jurisdiction.
Impact on internet services: Without net neutrality, ISPs could potentially create differently priced tiers of service for online content providers based on their internet use. This could lead to something akin to cable companies offering premium content bundles and packages.
State legislation: As the debate over net neutrality continues, individual states in the U.S. have passed legislation concerning net neutrality within their own territory.²

Net neutrality has been a hot-button issue over the past two decades, sparking intense debates and policy changes in the United States and around the world. The principle of net neutrality governs how internet service providers (ISPs) treat data on the internet, preventing them from discriminating against different types of online content.

This principle has been pivotal in maintaining the internet as a platform for innovation, free expression and economic growth. However, the journey of net neutrality has been fraught with contention, policy reversals and ongoing legal battles that reflect the struggle between regulatory oversight and the interests of powerful network owners.

This article will dive into the definition of net neutrality, take a look at its historical timeline, examine its pros and cons, and provide real-world examples. As we delve into the complexities of net neutrality, we’ll uncover not just a policy issue, but also a fundamental question about the future of the internet and its role in society.

Meet the experts

Aleksandar Kochovski (Writer)

Aleksandar Kochovski is a cybersecurity expert with a robust background in areas crucial to online security such as VPNs, secure cloud storage and digital security software. His tenure at Cloudwards spans nearly four years, marked by a specialized focus on writing and editing content that demystifies complex cybersecurity topics, including data protection, internet privacy and encryption. With a Master’s Degree in Architecture and an academic career as an assistant professor, Aleksandar combines his analytical prowess with his cybersecurity knowledge, ensuring insightful and clear communication on topics like network security, malware prevention and safeguarding against online vulnerabilities. His commitment to educating audiences about cyber threats and protecting against identity theft solidifies his standing as a go-to source in the realm of online security.

More about Aleksandar Kochovski

Aleksander Hougen (Co-Chief Editor)

Aleksander Hougen, the co-chief editor at Cloudwards, is a recognized expert in online security, merging his postgraduate in software engineering with a passion for digital security. He excels in simplifying the complexities of secure cloud storage, online backup and VPNs, making them relatable for technology enthusiasts. His content often delves into the realms of cybersecurity, emphasizing data protection and internet safety. As a digital nomad, Aleksander’s global experiences enrich his perspectives on the evolving cybersecurity landscape, ensuring his writings are not just informative, but also underscore the importance of encryption and cyber safety measures in the digital world.

More about Aleksander Hougen

Learn more about our editorial team and our research process.

04/25/2024 Facts checked

Rewritten to reflect the return of net neutrality regulations in the United States.
updates

What Is Net Neutrality and Why Is It Important?

Net neutrality is the guiding principle that internet service providers should treat all internet traffic equally, without discrimination or preferred access based on user, content, website, platform, type of device or communication method. This means ISPs cannot block, slow down or charge more for certain websites, apps or online services.

Comprehend the essential role a VPN plays in safeguarding your digital life
Gain a deep understanding of how VPNs function under the hood
Develop the ability to distinguish fact from fiction in VPN promotions

The concept of network neutrality is a cornerstone of preserving the free and open internet, granting users equal opportunity to access any legal online services they choose without impediment from internet service providers. This prevents ISPs from giving unfair advantage to their own services or restricting access to their competitors.

How Does Net Neutrality Work?

According to the principles of net neutrality, ISPs and other broadband providers are required to transmit all data at the same speed and quality, without prioritizing or degrading certain types of internet connections, web pages or internet services. This ensures users can access any legal services on the internet without interference or discrimination from their internet provider.

A Timeline of Net Neutrality History

The general idea of net neutrality first became a topic of debate with the popularization of the internet in the 1990s, but it wasn’t until 2003 that the concept crystalized and took concrete form. Since then, various legislation has been introduced to regulate U.S. broadband providers. The following is a timeline of the history of net neutrality in the United States:

2003: Columbia University Professor Tim Wu coins the term “net neutrality.”
2004: The FCC under President Bush releases a statement highlighting the importance of preserving the freedom of the internet.
2005: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopts the net neutrality principles, establishing guidelines for ISPs to follow in managing internet traffic.
2008: Net neutrality rules meet their first challenge when Comcast begins throttling users’ speed when using BitTorrent.
2010: The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturns the FCC’s enforcement action against Comcast, ruling that the FCC lacked the proper jurisdiction to enforce net neutrality principles in that case. The FCC adopts new rules in response.
2014: The D.C. Circuit overturns the FCC’s new rules, as it still lacked the authority to enforce net neutrality decisions under Title II of the Communications Act.
2015: The FCC under the Obama administration reclassifies broadband providers as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act, placing them under its own purview for enforcement purposes.
2016: The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals finally accepts the FCC’s net neutrality rules.
2017: Under new leadership, the FCC votes to repeal net neutrality rules, eliminating the Title II classification for broadband providers and once again removing ISPs from its jurisdiction.
2019: The repeal of net neutrality rules is challenged in court, with the Federal Appeals Court ultimately ruling to uphold the FCC’s decision.
2020: Several states, including California and Washington, enact their own net neutrality laws in response to the federal repeal, ensuring net neutrality protections within their borders.
2023: The FCC under Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel proposes new rules that once again classify broadband providers as telecommunication services, placing them back under the FCC’s jurisdiction.

Net Neutrality Laws and Regulations

The United States and the European Union have been at the forefront on the issue of net neutrality, though other countries have joined in to enact its principles as law. Here is an overview of some of these countries:

1. United States

The concept of net neutrality first emerged in the United States. Despite a period where the FCC refused to enforce network neutrality, it is now again within its purview, ensuring regulations are fully enforced.

2. European Union

As of November 2015, Article 3 of EU Regulation 2015/2120 sets out a fundamental framework that guarantees internet neutrality across the entire region. This regulation emerged from European Commission deliberations in 2007.

3. United Kingdom

Having left the EU, the U.K. is no longer beholden to the Union’s net neutrality regulations. However, the country’s net neutrality legislation is still based on EU guidelines and there’s no talk of repealing it, as it would likely be seen as an unpopular choice.

Ofcom (the U.K.’s telecoms regulator) revised the U.K.’s net neutrality rules in 2023 to allow ISPs to offer “premium services” and other tailored packages, such as ones that would work better on 5G networks or with certain applications. These changes hinge on the ISP making it clear to the user what the package entails.

4. The Rest of the World

Other countries around the world have their own track records regarding regulations, or lack thereof, for IPSs. Some examples include:

🇨🇳 China: No net neutrality regulations are in place.
🇷🇺 Russia: Russia does not uphold net neutrality, as regulations from 2007 let ISPs throttle P2P and other traffic deemed hazardous to a provider’s network. Since 2016, Russian ISPs have not been allowed to restrict access to websites of their own volition; they can only do so for websites already blocked by the government.
🇮🇳 India: India prohibited differential pricing in 2016 and authorized further net neutrality regulations in 2018. As a result of net neutrality rules, some broadband providers such as Facebook (now Meta) shut down operations in India.

The Pros and Cons of Net Neutrality

The net neutrality debate is often fought along party lines in the U.S., despite it benefitting all internet users equally. These are some of the alleged benefits and drawbacks of net neutrality.

Net Neutrality Pros

Provides an Even Playing Field for Online Companies
- Net neutrality ensures competition and innovation among technology companies providing online services. It allows smaller companies to innovate and operate without facing unfair advantages or preferential treatment from ISPs toward larger companies.
  
  Without network neutrality, large companies could pay internet service providers to block competing services or lower their connection speeds. This is why net neutrality is one of the pillars of internet freedom.
Protects Free Speech and Expression
- By preventing ISPs from blocking or restricting access to certain websites or online services, net neutrality safeguards the free and open internet. Net neutrality proponents believe that eliminating net neutrality could result in the degradation or outright loss of internet access for millions of less privileged people.
Ensures Equal Access to the Free Internet
- Deregulating broadband providers could result in ISPs blocking access to certain user groups. Without net neutrality, ISPs are free to discriminate and deny data services to users. Blocking legal content or reducing internet speeds for select services could become legal if net neutrality were repealed again.
Protects the Rights of Journalists
- Without net neutrality, ISPs could block or restrict access to certain content, stifling critics of governments around the world.
Keeps High-Bandwidth Services Affordable
- High-bandwidth applications are the original catalyst for net neutrality. In the U.S. and Russia, net neutrality debates began with discussions around P2P traffic, and then around streaming traffic later on as Netflix gained popularity. A lack of net neutrality rules could result in a situation similar to the one in Russia, where ISPs are explicitly allowed to restrict torrenting traffic.

Net Neutrality Cons

Could Stifle Innovation
- Because ISPs are forced to treat all network traffic equally, it could prevent the emergence of technologies that are tailored for certain types of traffic, at least according to net neutrality opponents. For example, it might prevent an ISP from offering a service optimized for streaming traffic, even if it’s something a user might want or need.
  
  However, the counterargument is that net neutrality simply does not prevent ISPs from creating innovative technologies or optimizing their networks. Additionally, net neutrality can allow specialized services to exist as long as they don’t infringe on open internet rules, which makes the ISP argument all the more unconvincing.
Could Stifle Investment
- As ISPs under net neutrality are not allowed to price their traffic differently, they might be discouraged from investing in their network and improving speeds. This is a common argument set out by ISPs, though this hasn’t proven to be the case, with major breakthroughs such as LTE and 5G emerging after net neutrality was established.
  
  The easiest rebuttal to this argument is that net neutrality actually encourages investments and innovation. After all, if ISPs are allowed to charge more for high-bandwidth tasks, why would they ever upgrade their infrastructure to handle more traffic?
Removes a Potential Revenue Stream for ISPs
- Some opponents of net neutrality believe that banning differential or tiered pricing, paid prioritization and internet fast lanes might impact ISPs’ bottom line to such an extent that they might not be able to operate or maintain their broadband networks.
  
  However, ISPs have historically been extremely lucrative, with billionaires Rocco Commisso, Sunil Mittal and Xavier Niel all owning broadband providers. Carlos Slim, Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk all have their own internet providers as well, and each has been the richest person in the world at one point.

Net Neutrality Examples

Some examples of how net neutrality laws impact users and companies include:

Meta’s Free Basics program allowed disadvantaged users in certain countries free access to the internet but unwittingly charged for access to photos, videos and other services. As this was in clear violation of net neutrality, and India’s regulations in particular, the provider pulled out of India when the country codified these regulations.
Comcast’s tussle with the FCC shaped today’s net neutrality rules. The company was found to be intentionally slowing down peer-to-peer traffic and allegedly throttling traffic flowing toward Netflix and other streaming services. Complaints started pouring in in 2007, and the FCC enforced its regulations with Comcast the following year.
YouTube and Netflix are among the most prominent net neutrality proponents. Video streaming requires a lot of bandwidth, comprising a whopping 65% of all internet traffic in the U.S. Deregulation would disproportionately impact streaming services, as net neutrality prevents extra charges to access streaming content or high-quality streaming.

Final Thoughts

Net neutrality remains a complex and often contentious issue, with more or less valid arguments on both sides. However, the fundamental principle of treating all internet users equally is critical to maintaining a free internet that fosters innovation, protects user rights and ensures equal internet access for all.

As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the debate around net neutrality will likely continue, with policymakers, broadband providers and internet users all vying to shape the future of the open internet. What are your thoughts on net neutrality? Have you ever faced ISP throttling? Let us know in the comments below, and as always, thank you for reading.

FAQ: Net Neutrality Definition

The principle of net neutrality dictates that no ISP can throttle, block access to or otherwise discriminate against certain types of internet traffic. This means that an ISP can’t charge you more for streaming, charge fees for “premium traffic” or block legal websites and other content. It also prevents ISPs from slowing down your internet while streaming or torrenting.
People who are against net neutrality are usually those who can benefit from its repeal, such as wealthy ISP owners, or those who prefer the neoliberal approach of deregulating all aspects of the free market.
Yes, as of December 2023, net neutrality is back on the menu in the U.S. following a five-year break.
Net neutrality has no downsides for users in a practical sense. All arguments against net neutrality revolve around ISPs making less money by not being able to charge users more for high-demand traffic like streaming. According to opponents, this could lead to stagnation in innovation, though history has proven otherwise.

Sources: